You are currently viewing the archive for September 2003.

Mind set

Labor wants to know who leaked the secret volume of the Cole commission’s findings. Given the Government’s usual reaction to leaks (ie, instigate a witch-hunt) and the recent controversy over the leak of Wilkie’s ASIO report, Tony Abbott certainly needs to explain why he hasn’t sought to find out what happened. His response?

This volume, it never came into my hands, it’s never been in my hands and I think dealing with this subsequent leak is really out of my hands but I’d be happy to see an investigation if that’s what the relevant people want.

That is quite bizarre. The Minister for Workplace Relations calls a royal commission into the building industry, but doesn’t read the chapter containing the most serious allegations — yet he manages to develop a drastic overhaul of the entire building industry.

There is no doubt about it — Abbott’s reforms are not about fixing the building industry, they’re about union bashing. If he can respond to the commission’s findings without even reading them, his mind was clearly made up in advance.

UPDATE: An excellent comment from Manas: “It all sounds a bit children ‘not’ overboard… Do Ministers in the Federal Government get to see any document of importance?”

Another one! Ken Parish has

Another one! Ken Parish has hit fifty. Congrats, Ken.

2:55 pm · comments off

Two blogospherical milestones: Graham is

Two blogospherical milestones: Graham is thirty, and Gareth is twenty-one. Happy birthdays, fellers.

1:10 pm · comments off

The Lateline History Challenge results

The Lateline History Challenge results are in. I forgot to enter — in case you hadn’t worked it out, deadlines and I don’t get along so well…

5:12 pm · comments off

Jingo jangle

In today’s West Australian:

BRIAN COXE (Burning our flag is treason, 19/9) writes that “flag burning is the worst form of disrespect that anyone can show a country and its citizens”.

I disagree with his view. In a strange, almost paradoxical way, flag burners are showing greater respect for the flag and what it stands for than do many of those who wrap themselves in it on a regular basis.

At least the flag burners recognise the potency of the flag as a symbol of Australia’s democracy and freedoms. The burning flag represents the incineration of Australia’s democratic values, be it by our treatment of asylum seekers, our participation in the Iraqi war, or whatever the cause of the day might be.

On the other hand, those who shriek loudest for the further erosion of our hard-won freedoms show little respect for the flag. Anyone who drives down St Georges Terrace will notice the faded rags wrapped around the flagpoles at Anzac House, the RSL’s WA headquarters.

This is far more disrespectful to those who have fought and died under the flag. It doesn’t say “we believe the great nation you fought for is being damaged”, it simply says “we don’t care”.

Perhaps the RSL and the other jingoists should get their own house in order before they undermine the rights and freedoms our flag represents.

ROBERT CORR, Greenwood.

Wait a minute, did I just accuse the RSL of not caring about the servicemen who died in combat? Hmm, that might get a reaction…

In belated celebration of international

In belated celebration of international Talk Like A Pirate Day, a pirate ninja. Also the monkey, (alas, not the three-headed variety) and sausages. Oh, and cheese. In the 80s.

12:58 pm · comments off

Benito the benign

John Ray takes exception to Gareth Parker’s characterisation of him, saying,

Gareth Parker, one of my fellow conservative Australian bloggers has described me as too “lunar” for him. I wonder would he like to point out one claim I have made that is not backed up with good scientific and historical evidence?

One doesn’t need to look very hard. In the immediately preceding post, Ray claims that

The Italian Prime minister has just come under fire for pointing out that Mussolini … was nowhere nearly as vicious as Hitler and Stalin. He is perfectly correct. … The standard Italian Fascist treatment of political opponents was not the firing squad, the Gulag or the concentration camp but a forced dose of castor-oil!

Interesting. While it is certainly true that Hitler and Stalin were worse than Mussolini, John Ray seems to endorse Berlusconi’s statement that “Mussolini never killed anyone.” That is one claim made that is not backed up with good scientific and historical evidence:

Historians say that wide persecution of Jews began in 1938, when Mussolini introduced Italy’s first anti-Semitic laws, opening the way for the eventual deportation of about 7,000 Jews.

It is believed that some 5,910 of them were killed.

Must’ve been some strong castor-oil…

But even if John Ray can excuse Mussolini because he merely deported Jews to a nation that is carrying out a genocide against them, instead of doing the dirty work at home, there is plenty of other historical evidence stacking up against him.

Historian Dennis Mack Smith, who wrote the biography “Mussolini,” said the Italian dictator was not a killer on the scale of Hitler or Stalin, but had certainly been a brutal leader.

“Mussolini never stood over and ordered killings himself,” Mack Smith said. “He would not do it himself because he was rather squeamish. But he had absolutely no compunction in having people killed.”

Everybody knows that Mussolini had a militia whose purpose was to assault and kill his political opponents. The Blackshirts were

Armed squads of Italian Fascists under Benito Mussolini who wore black shirts as part of their uniform.

The squads, first organized in 1919, targeted socialists, communists, republicans, and others. Hundreds of people were killed as the squads grew in number. In 1922 Blackshirts from all over Italy participated in the March on Rome [led by Mussolini].

I never knew the Blackshirts were armed with castor-oil, but they must have gone through a lot of it to kill hundreds of Mussolini’s political opponents.

Then again, as John Ray points out, “the facts can be pretty ‘lunar’ at times. They certainly conflict with a lot of popular notions.”

Never let the facts get in the way

The Sydney Morning Herald wrote,

A move to expel Yasser Arafat has brought supporters streaming to his door, and he’s as happy as a sandboy about it.

Tim Blair thinks that is non-PC language and asks, “Wonder how many letters to the editor this will generate.”

Who knows? But none of them should be printed, because “sandboy” is not a “non-PC” term at all. A sandboy is not, as Blair hints, a racist reference to Arabs, but rather refers to a boy who carts sand around. And they were happy because they were paid in beer.

It wouldn’t have taken much effort for Tim to check this before he posted his ridiculous call to arms, because Google throws up quite a few definitions:

  • “Only when the trade of sandboy had died out around the middle of the century could it be taken as a figurative reference to happiness.”

  • “a peddler of sand at a seashore resort; used now only to express great happiness in the expression ‘happy as a sandboy’”

  • “Small boys, ’sandboys’, will bring in buckets of sand and be paid with small amounts of beer which can make one smile excessively, hence the ‘happy’ part of your phrase.”

But perhaps I’m wrong. Perhaps the Sydney Morning Herald really is racist by using that term. In which case I’m sure Tim will suggest that his readers write to this Coffs Harbour holiday resort demanding that it change its name.

From a recent Christopher Pearson

From a recent Christopher Pearson column: “Don watson … said Windschuttle ’should be put in a bag and thrown in the Murray’… No doubt Watson would defend himself against any charge that he meant to suggest Windschuttle be literally dispatched as deafness to irony. Yet … if he didn’t mean it, why invite people to conjure the idea?” Yes, that’s right. Watson is going to murder Windschuttle.

Tim Blair mentions Saddam Hussein

Tim Blair mentions Saddam Hussein and Benito Mussolini, but appears to have forgotten about his hero

2:59 pm · comments off

Some thoughts on I/P

I’ve been trying to reformulate my opinions about Israel and Palestine lately. In part, they are a response to Simon Crean’s disgracefully one-sided speech about the issue, but I’ve also been thinking about recent developments in the Middle East.
Read the rest of this entry…

James Russell has put together

James Russell has put together an outstanding essay (pdf) about blogging, in response to Tim Dunlop and Ken Parish.

3:22 pm · comments off

Calling all conspiracy theorists…

I was disturbed to read that the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age had removed themselves from the Google News service. I often use Google News to make sure I haven’t missed anything interesting and to stay on top of breaking news, so the removal of Fairfax from its list of sources was not cool.

I told the Sydney Morning Herald so, thus:

From: Robert Corr
To: Sydney Morning Herald online
Sent: Tuesday, 9 September 2003 8:51
Subject: SMH Site Feedback

I notice that the Sydney Morning Herald is no longer accessible through Google News. I wish to register my protest against this decision, as I regularly use Google News to keep track of the latest news as it is posted online.

To me, your decision seems foolish, as you have ceded a valuable tool to your competitors. Given a list of stories about a particular subject, I would tend to choose the SMH or Age reports above the News Ltd equivalents, as I believe your reporting is superior. However, I will no longer be able to do so. Furthermore, people with no preference as to the source of their news will now be guided away from your site.

I understand that there may have been some problem with Google News links circumventing your News Store system. However, surely there is a simple solution to the problem at your end. It seems ridiculous that in order to shore up your online profit-base, you are prepared to alienate potentially thousands of online readers — and even those stories which have not yet been archived in the News Store are blocked!

Please do me, yourself and countless internet users a favour and return the Fairfax websites to the Google News service.

Yours sincerely,

Robert Corr

I received an interesting reply from the Site Editor (who apparently doesn’t understand punctuation. Not a good look for a newspaper):

From: Sydney Morning Herald online
To: Robert Corr
Sent: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:29:31 +1000
Subject: Re: SMH Site Feedback

hi robert
smh.com.au is available through google news. there has been no change. in fact we have optimised our site to try and ensure that google picks up as much as possible form our site because we want the traffic.
regards
stephen hutcheon
site editor

Sadly, he’s wrong. A search for +the source:sydney_morning_herald reveals that Google News doesn’t recognise any SMH articles beyond 2 September (over a week ago). The same goes for The Age.

Is this just an innocent mistake, or another example of Google censorship?

UPDATE: Things are back to normal again.

How did I miss Dan’s

How did I miss Dan’s blog for so long? It’s top-notch — although he appears to be having a few layout issues at the moment. Gareth, on the other hand, has got a cool new design and it even works in Mozilla!

11:26 pm · comments off

I’ve got two months left

I’ve got two months left in which to finish my honours thesis. Crap. I’ve spent nearly all of my free time sifting through the archives, and although I still have a lot left to do in there I’d better start writing now. Oh, and Dr Sarah Gregson’s doctoral thesis will be useful. (At least the parts about the 1916 Kalgoorlie race riot.)

9:23 pm · comments off