Comments on: Republicans against Bush

By: Jim Harvey

Jim Harvey — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000

Not really very surprising (to someone from US)

There are many Republican “liberals” (I’m one, on paper), who might well vote Democrat in the end.

And there are lots of people having doubts about Bush right now (for obvious reasons).

So, 4-5% protest vote seems surprising LOW, to me

By: Manny Paulet

Manny Paulet — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000

I am an Army veteran and life long Republican. I will not vote for a Democrat no matter what, however, I am trying to get as many of my fellow Republicans as possible to vote for the Reform Party for President for the following purposes:

1) Send a message to Gillspie that we are the party of fiscal responsability and limited government.

2) To cause a Democrat to win and thereby forestall the Clinton presidency in 2008.

3) To convince Republcians not to just stay at home, but to come out and vote for Republicans in Congress. In my view, Congress is much more important than the Presidency anyway. It was a GOP congress that produced a fiscally responsible “Clinton administration”. Many Republicans are currently planning to sit this one out. It could cost us congressional control.

Check it out at http://www.ragbush.com

By: jonathan singleton

jonathan singleton — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000

Recall that Republican were ‘frothing’ at the mouth
to end the CLINTON/GORE era, and in their rush
to send anybody the Republican electorate could
coalesce around may have picked a President that
will damage their and the US’s national credibility.
BILL FRIST to the rescue!

By: Harry Wettig

Harry Wettig — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000

I invite you to visit and participate in my Web Site >

Bush must go! The democrat nominee is the only alternative. We can survive 4 years of Kerry. Another 4 Years of Bush and friends will destroy us!