<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The politics of the Passion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/</link>
	<description>"The thinking Laborite would as lief be found in bed with a cobra as in a committee room armed with 'arguments' from the Tory press." --- Truth, Perth, 19 June 1915.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:29:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/comment-page-1/#comment-4834</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 02:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/#comment-4834</guid>
		<description>can you add some more political reasons pertaining of christ&#039;s execution??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you add some more political reasons pertaining of christ&#8217;s execution??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer Paxton</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/comment-page-1/#comment-2843</link>
		<dc:creator>Homer Paxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/#comment-2843</guid>
		<description>quite an interesting essay Rob, I would prefer not to many any bitter, ignorant or inconsistent comment as there are too many areas to cover.
I congratulate you on your writing style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quite an interesting essay Rob, I would prefer not to many any bitter, ignorant or inconsistent comment as there are too many areas to cover.<br />
I congratulate you on your writing style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/comment-page-1/#comment-2844</link>
		<dc:creator>James Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/#comment-2844</guid>
		<description>Have you read A.N. Wilson&#039;s biog of Jesus (called, funnily enough, Jesus)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you read A.N. Wilson&#8217;s biog of Jesus (called, funnily enough, Jesus)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Honnor</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/comment-page-1/#comment-2845</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Honnor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/#comment-2845</guid>
		<description>Now you do know it was gently meant Rob? 
And Stephen Hill&#039;s comment was pretty slick :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you do know it was gently meant Rob?<br />
And Stephen Hill&#8217;s comment was pretty slick :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/comment-page-1/#comment-2846</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/#comment-2846</guid>
		<description>No, I haven&#039;t read that book, James. I&#039;ll add it to my ever-growing &quot;to read&quot; pile...

Geoff, I did indeed know it was gently meant. And very funny, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I haven&#8217;t read that book, James. I&#8217;ll add it to my ever-growing &#8220;to read&#8221; pile&#8230;</p>
<p>Geoff, I did indeed know it was gently meant. And very funny, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/comment-page-1/#comment-2847</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/#comment-2847</guid>
		<description>There are quite a few problems re consitency, Robert. I&#039;m surprised you feel it&#039;s a much of a case for claiming Jesus was a political rebel, in any normal sense of these words.
Pilate, for example, is perhaps shown to have had political motivations for RELUCTANTLY changing his position to safeguard himself; but this hardly suggests he saw Christ as a political threat, or even that those who threatened Pilate with a riot Rome wouldn&#039;t like, actually did so because they were worried about Jesus&#039;s threat to Rome.
We&#039;re told Jesus stipulated clearly they should &quot;give unto Caesar that which is Caesar&#039;s.&quot;
Pilate even offered the mob an alternative victim for the crucifixion.  Surely not the action of a Governor who deemed Jesus a GENUINE revolutionary threat?
Then again, in our postmodern academic world, perhaps we mustn&#039;t draw too firm a line between history and literature, analysis and poetry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are quite a few problems re consitency, Robert. I&#8217;m surprised you feel it&#8217;s a much of a case for claiming Jesus was a political rebel, in any normal sense of these words.<br />
Pilate, for example, is perhaps shown to have had political motivations for RELUCTANTLY changing his position to safeguard himself; but this hardly suggests he saw Christ as a political threat, or even that those who threatened Pilate with a riot Rome wouldn&#8217;t like, actually did so because they were worried about Jesus&#8217;s threat to Rome.<br />
We&#8217;re told Jesus stipulated clearly they should &#8220;give unto Caesar that which is Caesar&#8217;s.&#8221;<br />
Pilate even offered the mob an alternative victim for the crucifixion.  Surely not the action of a Governor who deemed Jesus a GENUINE revolutionary threat?<br />
Then again, in our postmodern academic world, perhaps we mustn&#8217;t draw too firm a line between history and literature, analysis and poetry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/comment-page-1/#comment-2848</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2004/02/26/the-politics-of-the-passion/#comment-2848</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;perhaps we mustn&#039;t draw too firm a line between history and literature, analysis and poetry?&lt;/em&gt;

I think I made it fairly clear that the sources were unreliable.

I also made it clear that it was impossible to know whether Pilate considered Jesus a genuine threat, or whether he feared rioting, or something else. I suggested that on balance, there is reason to believe that he executed Jesus as a rebel to be on the safe side.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>perhaps we mustn&#8217;t draw too firm a line between history and literature, analysis and poetry?</em></p>
<p>I think I made it fairly clear that the sources were unreliable.</p>
<p>I also made it clear that it was impossible to know whether Pilate considered Jesus a genuine threat, or whether he feared rioting, or something else. I suggested that on balance, there is reason to believe that he executed Jesus as a rebel to be on the safe side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

