<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New look news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/</link>
	<description>"The thinking Laborite would as lief be found in bed with a cobra as in a committee room armed with 'arguments' from the Tory press." --- Truth, Perth, 19 June 1915.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:29:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/comment-page-1/#comment-3257</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/#comment-3257</guid>
		<description>Same old West content?  You can&#039;t be reading too closely ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same old West content?  You can&#8217;t be reading too closely &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/comment-page-1/#comment-3258</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/#comment-3258</guid>
		<description>perhaps. Gareth, anything that&#039;s not &quot;old left&quot;, isn&#039;t read all that carefully by some?
What chance, by the way Gareth, of some NEW comment on your &quot;old&quot; site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps. Gareth, anything that&#8217;s not &#8220;old left&#8221;, isn&#8217;t read all that carefully by some?<br />
What chance, by the way Gareth, of some NEW comment on your &#8220;old&#8221; site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/comment-page-1/#comment-3259</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/#comment-3259</guid>
		<description>(But you&#039;re right, the website is a pile of trash).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(But you&#8217;re right, the website is a pile of trash).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/comment-page-1/#comment-3260</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/#comment-3260</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a few new columnists, but I don&#039;t think they&#039;re earth-shattering. The news content hasn&#039;t changed, as far as I can tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a few new columnists, but I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re earth-shattering. The news content hasn&#8217;t changed, as far as I can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shayne</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/comment-page-1/#comment-3261</link>
		<dc:creator>shayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/#comment-3261</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m inclined to wonder whether theres some fairfax involvement here. I just noticed there was an *awfully* large number of Age (I *think* the age is fairfax?) articles.

I gotta say, I dont like the new look of the West at all. Reminds me way too much of east state papers and most of those are shiet. 

Now I note theyve upped the font from 8.something to 9.something. Supposed to be easier to read. Watch that space. What they MEAN to say, is &quot;less content&quot;.

Its that old undergrad observation that 11 point fonts and 1.5 spacing adds a few more pages to that 2K word essay without a greatly noticable change in visible density.

And where the hell has Alston gone?

The west has lost the plot imho. From a newspaper that was once praised by Media Watch as the closeset to an &#039;unbiased&#039; paper as Australia had on offer (based on Media watches assesment of most being pro war in GWar 2 , SMH being anti war, and the West sitting on the fence) to a complete govt mouth piece.

Gerald Henderson? Boo! Reds under the bed.

As one Journalist wag once said , to the expense of his career.. &quot;Bring back Mooney&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m inclined to wonder whether theres some fairfax involvement here. I just noticed there was an *awfully* large number of Age (I *think* the age is fairfax?) articles.</p>
<p>I gotta say, I dont like the new look of the West at all. Reminds me way too much of east state papers and most of those are shiet. </p>
<p>Now I note theyve upped the font from 8.something to 9.something. Supposed to be easier to read. Watch that space. What they MEAN to say, is &#8220;less content&#8221;.</p>
<p>Its that old undergrad observation that 11 point fonts and 1.5 spacing adds a few more pages to that 2K word essay without a greatly noticable change in visible density.</p>
<p>And where the hell has Alston gone?</p>
<p>The west has lost the plot imho. From a newspaper that was once praised by Media Watch as the closeset to an &#8216;unbiased&#8217; paper as Australia had on offer (based on Media watches assesment of most being pro war in GWar 2 , SMH being anti war, and the West sitting on the fence) to a complete govt mouth piece.</p>
<p>Gerald Henderson? Boo! Reds under the bed.</p>
<p>As one Journalist wag once said , to the expense of his career.. &#8220;Bring back Mooney&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/comment-page-1/#comment-3262</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2004/04/21/new-look-news/#comment-3262</guid>
		<description>The West has had some kind of content-sharing deal with Fairfax for a while now. Henderson&#039;s columns are also run in the SMH and the Age, but we&#039;ve been getting them since before the redesign, so that&#039;s nothing new.

Re: the fonts. The easiest way to improve readability is to increase the space between lines. They could have done that without increasing the font size. So yeah, looks like we&#039;re getting less content now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The West has had some kind of content-sharing deal with Fairfax for a while now. Henderson&#8217;s columns are also run in the SMH and the Age, but we&#8217;ve been getting them since before the redesign, so that&#8217;s nothing new.</p>
<p>Re: the fonts. The easiest way to improve readability is to increase the space between lines. They could have done that without increasing the font size. So yeah, looks like we&#8217;re getting less content now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

