Fuck homophobia

Yay for the Nordeens, the Hot Lies and After the Fall. Highlight of the night, though, was the train ride home: watching a drunken homophobe get his arse kicked (literally) by an angry lesbian and her mates.

2:02 am · 29 August 2004 · comments off
  1. Gravatar

    What a pity the shadow attorney was not on the same train. But which side would she have joined?

    Alan · 29 August 2004 · 10:31 am
  2. Gravatar

    Nicola? Not only would she have come in to bat for the homophobe, she would have declared that the ALP will come in to bat for drunken homophobes on trains in the future.

    Torre · 29 August 2004 · 2:26 pm
  3. Gravatar

    So mindless violence is OK if it’s one of your favourite minorities doing the kicking? Idiot.

    PB · 29 August 2004 · 3:38 pm
  4. Gravatar

    Nice that you can characterise it as “mindless violence” when you weren’t there and didn’t see what happened. It was very funny — almost slapstick — and everyone (including the homophobic “victim” and the security guards) took it in good humour.

    Idiot.

    Robert · 29 August 2004 · 3:54 pm
  5. Gravatar

    I like how wingnuts drop the ‘nuke em all’ stance and get all peace and love when they hear about this kind of thing. Nice one PB.

    Anthony · 29 August 2004 · 7:30 pm
  6. Gravatar

    Are you callin’ PB a wingnut?

    Mark · 29 August 2004 · 7:39 pm
  7. Gravatar

    I wouldn’t know PB if he fell on me, and I’m sure we both hope that won’t happen. It’s just a general observation.

    Anthony · 29 August 2004 · 8:40 pm
  8. Gravatar

    Oh, it was *humorous* violence.

    Well, that’s all right then.

    Evil Pundit · 29 August 2004 · 9:17 pm
  9. Gravatar

    Hmm looks like the defenders of freedom have gone all holding hands and kumbayah on us.

    Talk the talk, walk the walk boys and girls.

    anthony · 29 August 2004 · 10:47 pm
  10. Gravatar

    It is, of course, a complete defence to a charge of assault if one was invited to commit the act of “violence”. In this case, the tosser was mouthing off. He was told to shut up or have his arse kicked. At that point, he mooned the train — dacks down — and said, “go on then”. I don’t think he expected the woman to follow through with it, but he got what he asked for.

    If you want to pretend this is the end of the world, go right ahead. But everyone involved took it in good humour, so did all the witnesses, and there was no harm done (except, perhaps, to the dickhead’s inflated ego).

    So get over it, and go back to your warmongering. Because non-humourous violence is okay… or something. I can’t pretend to follow your logic.

    Robert · 29 August 2004 · 11:49 pm
  11. Gravatar

    Murdering 10,000 Iraqis for no reason in particular vs. one drunken yob getting his arse kicked.

    Mmm, yes, I can see the moral equivalency. Absolutely.

    vaara · 30 August 2004 · 3:32 am
  12. Gravatar

    They must teach an unusual school of crim law in WA- an invitation to violence is a defence to an assault charge? Good grief. I am at least consistent, as opposed to those who preach that violence solves nothing (except when it suits your own twisted beliefs. I bet you think rolling marbles in fron of mounted police and throwing bags of urine at cops at protests is justified, because it’s for a cause…)
    I think violence solves a lot, if done right.
    I may be a fascist thug, but I’m not a hypocrite.

    PB · 30 August 2004 · 7:53 am
  13. Gravatar

    Where have I ever said that violence solves nothing? Please stop putting words in my mouth.

    And here’s a quotation from Criminal Law in Queensland and Western Australia:

    Under any of the forms of assault, the conduct must occur without the consent of the victim. … Consent, in respect of assault generally, is not itself defined in the Codes. … Section 319(2)(a) of the Western Australia Code now expressly provides that, for the purposes of the law of sexual violence, consent means consent ‘freely and voluntarily given’ and excludes an expression of consent which is ‘obtained by force, threat intimidation, deception or fraudulent means’. It is to be expected that a similar interpretation of the term would be adopted for assault generally by the courts in Western Australia and also Queensland.

    Now fuck off.

    Robert · 30 August 2004 · 8:41 am
  14. Gravatar

    That covers a fight mutually agreed to by the protoganists- I don’t think a brown-eye is normally regarded as an invitation to fisticuffs- it may be an invitation to some other nasty behaviour, however.

    PB · 30 August 2004 · 9:30 am
  15. Gravatar

    You’re joking, right? Someone says, “I’ll kick your arse”, he bends over and says, “go on then”. That’s not an invitation?

    Robert · 30 August 2004 · 9:42 am
  16. Gravatar

    depends on the kicking- are we talking a playful mock boot, or a full scale Doc Marten tattoo? You’re telling the story.

    PB · 30 August 2004 · 10:21 am
  17. Gravatar

    Yes, I am telling the story. I thought my statement that “there was no harm done” covered that. Maybe you should read before shooting your mouth off.

    Robert · 30 August 2004 · 1:38 pm
  18. Gravatar

    We might be dumb hillbillies here in the north-east, but “getting your arse kicked” in the local vernacular means you’ve had the shit beaten out of you. I had no idea the west was so colloqially different, or was it more some hyperbole to describe some inane street theatre for bored plebs on public transport?

    PB · 30 August 2004 · 2:10 pm
  19. Gravatar

    What I want to know is, did the Lesbians pash afterwards?

    yobbo · 31 August 2004 · 4:51 am
  20. Gravatar

    Or during, and do you have video? Were they porno-style lesbians, or the boiler-suit discus thrower type?

    PB · 31 August 2004 · 6:40 am