<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freedom of contract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/choice/</link>
	<description>"The thinking Laborite would as lief be found in bed with a cobra as in a committee room armed with 'arguments' from the Tory press." --- Truth, Perth, 19 June 1915.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:29:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: yobbo</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/choice/comment-page-1/#comment-9788</link>
		<dc:creator>yobbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2005 12:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/1326/#comment-9788</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob, just letting you know your website is banned in China. You haven&#039;t been talking about the Falun Gong or Freeing Tibet lately, have you? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob, just letting you know your website is banned in China. You haven&#8217;t been talking about the Falun Gong or Freeing Tibet lately, have you? :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Calabrese</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/choice/comment-page-1/#comment-9780</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Calabrese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/1326/#comment-9780</guid>
		<description>An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/workers-will-be-on-their-knees-for-fair-pay/2005/06/24/1119321902732.html&quot;&gt;Excellent Summary&lt;/a&gt; on the perils of Howard&#039;s &quot;IR Reforms&quot;.

This should be compulsoary reading by ALL workers.

Plus the West are hypocrites about whinging about the WA Govt using Taxpayers money to fight these reforms - and then accepting payment to run those same ads they say are propoganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/workers-will-be-on-their-knees-for-fair-pay/2005/06/24/1119321902732.html">Excellent Summary</a> on the perils of Howard&#8217;s &#8220;IR Reforms&#8221;.</p>
<p>This should be compulsoary reading by ALL workers.</p>
<p>Plus the West are hypocrites about whinging about the WA Govt using Taxpayers money to fight these reforms &#8211; and then accepting payment to run those same ads they say are propoganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/choice/comment-page-1/#comment-9774</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/1326/#comment-9774</guid>
		<description>I was interested to see one of the ACTU ads on the subject. Only saw the one because I&#039;ve been busy. The woman on the phone with her two kids watching her from the couch as her boss announces to her she has to work a shift right now or lose her job. But I haven&#039;t got child care, she says. Bang. sacked. I was interested in the fact she called the guy on the other end of the phone &quot;sir&quot;. I thought it was strange in an australian context. We usually call our bosses by their first names these days, particularly at a level where they&#039;d be ringing up to arrange shifts. It didn&#039;t ring true at all. BUT... if things did go back to a more &quot;master and servant&quot; arrangement of individual contracts, perhaps they&#039;d introduce it.
Just a funny choice of words, I thought. Taste of things to come?
Lick that boot!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was interested to see one of the ACTU ads on the subject. Only saw the one because I&#8217;ve been busy. The woman on the phone with her two kids watching her from the couch as her boss announces to her she has to work a shift right now or lose her job. But I haven&#8217;t got child care, she says. Bang. sacked. I was interested in the fact she called the guy on the other end of the phone &#8220;sir&#8221;. I thought it was strange in an australian context. We usually call our bosses by their first names these days, particularly at a level where they&#8217;d be ringing up to arrange shifts. It didn&#8217;t ring true at all. BUT&#8230; if things did go back to a more &#8220;master and servant&#8221; arrangement of individual contracts, perhaps they&#8217;d introduce it.<br />
Just a funny choice of words, I thought. Taste of things to come?<br />
Lick that boot!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/choice/comment-page-1/#comment-9772</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 07:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/1326/#comment-9772</guid>
		<description>Yes, the choice is between an AWA or the sack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the choice is between an AWA or the sack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manas</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/choice/comment-page-1/#comment-9770</link>
		<dc:creator>Manas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/1326/#comment-9770</guid>
		<description>Well the government say that it is choose between an AWA and the award; ie: you can choose not to sign the AWA and remain on the Award.

But if the employer does&#039;t want to apply the award, and is determined to offer AWAs, well I think the technical term is that you&#039;re up shit creek without a paddle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the government say that it is choose between an AWA and the award; ie: you can choose not to sign the AWA and remain on the Award.</p>
<p>But if the employer does&#8217;t want to apply the award, and is determined to offer AWAs, well I think the technical term is that you&#8217;re up shit creek without a paddle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex White</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/choice/comment-page-1/#comment-9768</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/1326/#comment-9768</guid>
		<description>Surely choice would be &quot;choose between an AWA or the Award&quot;, not &quot;choose between the job or an AWA&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely choice would be &#8220;choose between an AWA or the Award&#8221;, not &#8220;choose between the job or an AWA&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mp</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/choice/comment-page-1/#comment-9767</link>
		<dc:creator>mp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/1326/#comment-9767</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;ve referred to since my law school days as &quot;the euphemism of choice&quot;; the choice you have when you aren&#039;t having a choice, might be another way to put it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;ve referred to since my law school days as &#8220;the euphemism of choice&#8221;; the choice you have when you aren&#8217;t having a choice, might be another way to put it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Calabrese</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/choice/comment-page-1/#comment-9766</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Calabrese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/1326/#comment-9766</guid>
		<description>Interesting to see Mark Olson on the news sticking up for his new Liberal Buddies re the Beat up over Public Servants being allowed to attend the Day Of Action without their pay being docked.

I&#039;ll bet the nurses aren&#039;t happy with him now :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to see Mark Olson on the news sticking up for his new Liberal Buddies re the Beat up over Public Servants being allowed to attend the Day Of Action without their pay being docked.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bet the nurses aren&#8217;t happy with him now :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/choice/comment-page-1/#comment-9763</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 07:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrag.net/2005/06/22/1326/#comment-9763</guid>
		<description>Rob,

Not a  comment as such, but I&#039;ve got a guest post ready to go, &quot;hot off the press&quot;, and can&#039;t find your email addy.  Please email it to me at pauljwatson AT hotmail.com , and I&#039;ll forward you the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,</p>
<p>Not a  comment as such, but I&#8217;ve got a guest post ready to go, &#8220;hot off the press&#8221;, and can&#8217;t find your email addy.  Please email it to me at pauljwatson AT hotmail.com , and I&#8217;ll forward you the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

