WordPress.com

A while ago I signed up for news about WordPress.com. That was before it launched, and even before the public was told what it was going to be. It turns out that WordPress.com is a hosted blogging service. It’s a bit like the WordPress version of Movable Type’s TypePad — but it’s free.

Anyway, the point of this post is that I received an “invite” (they should be “invitations,” not “invites,” but whaatever) and I’ve set up a blog to give it a test run. Here are my initial thoughts:

  • The installation was dead easy. Pick a username and title, enter your email address. Done.

  • Nice new colour scheme — bolder, more teal than grey. The dashboard looks a lot cleaner, and it’s far more welcoming than Wordpress. That’s important if it’s going to compete with Blogger.

  • The default theme is Kubrick, and there’s a nifty menu to choose one of 8 themes. Unfortunately, there’s no scope to customise them in any meaningful way. Hopefully that will change in the near future.

  • It includes 25MB of space for file uploads, including images, movies and MP3s (with a cap of 1.5MB per file). It’s a good idea — 25MB is enough for many people, and paid plans to expand that storage would give the service a viable income stream. Of course, you can use sites like Flickr to host your pictures, too.

  • The interface is based on WordPress 1.6, which is still in alpha — but this version is very polished. The WYSIWYG editor produces pretty good code, although I had a bit of trouble with the <!–more–> separator. You can always change back to the old “raw” input, on a per-user basis.

  • At least, the options say Personal Options (including rich v plain editor) “are just for you, they don’t affect other users on blog.” But I can’t work out how to add multiple users. I guess that’s a feature that hasn’t been implemented yet, so group blogs are ruled out for now. (However, the new user system in 1.6 is pretty sweet, and I expect it will find its way onto WordPress.com when the rough edges are knocked off.)

  • One concern I’ve got is comment spam. Although the new service appears to have the same “spam words” interface as WordPress, it really needs plugins to do a thorough job. The increase of spam on Blogger blogs shows that this will be a real problem, and it’d be nice to know what is going on behind the scenes to filter spam.

  • Come to think of it, there’s no way to use plugins at all. That’s one of the biggest benefits of using WordPress (or Movable Type) instead of Blogger. It’d be great to see them allow plugins in future, though it would no doubt pose some technical/security difficulties.

  • The invite system is integrated with your blogroll, so you can tick a box and the invitee will be added to your blogroll automatically when they activate their account. Nice touch.

Speaking of invites, if you want to give it a go you should sign up on the front page of WordPress.com. Of course, if you can’t wait your turn, I have one “golden ticket” to give away to someone who can convince me they’d put the blog to good use. Leave a comment if you’re interested.

Update: I’d really like to give the invite to a commenter (or a lurker, for that matter) who wants to give blogging a burl. They’ll jump the queue ahead of people who are already blogging.

2:05 pm · 18 September 2005 · comments off
  1. Gravatar

    Rob, Are the Terms & Conditions giving ownership of hosted content to WordPress or the user?

    Tama · 18 September 2005 · 3:44 pm
  2. Gravatar

    Hmm. Good question. I didn’t have to approve a EULA when I signed up — that should be up front and in your face, I reckon — so I’ll check now.

    Robert · 18 September 2005 · 6:59 pm
  3. Gravatar

    I just had a look, and I can’t find an agreement anywhere. I’m 99% sure WordPress doesn’t claim ownership, but I’ll contact the developers and find out for you.

    Robert · 18 September 2005 · 7:04 pm
  4. Gravatar

    I’ve been informed that they haven’t considered the issue yet, but the likely view is that the blogger retains ownership of their work. This will be set out in T&C when the site is publicly launched.

    Robert · 22 September 2005 · 7:16 pm
  5. Gravatar

    Sounds like a good policy! Thanks for doing the research Rob!

    Tama · 22 September 2005 · 11:16 pm
  6. Gravatar

    Yah, i agree. Thanks!

    Wahyu · 26 October 2005 · 4:26 pm