You are currently viewing the archive for the Pandagate category.

Most disturbing indeed

Will Pandagate never die?

Subject: hello there
From: Diana R[...]
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:49:31 -0500
To: Robert Corr

Greetings and salutations Robert Corr

I was idly cruising the net and decided to put in my various names to see what came up. I tried my present married name, my previous married name and my maiden name. Surprise, surprise. A whole PAGE of Diana Elgars – not related to me apparently – all to do with Ms Fits aka Marieke Hardy aka Diana Elgar. I find it most disturbing that an extremely unusual surname coupled with Diana (the less common Aussie form of Diane) be a rampaging rhino on the WWW. Did this little Ms Fits steal my name from me? How old is this wretch? Did I go to school with her and piss her off royally somehow and did she in an astounding act of retribution decide to make my name mud? I was very well known as a writer at school. I’m sure there are dozens of people out there saying, “Yeah, I went to school with her!! Wow, didn’t she turn into a foul-mouthed harlot?”

Most disturbing indeed.

Most cordially yours,

Diana (ex Elgar).

Profiling a blogger

There’s an interesting profile of Ms Fits in The Age, but Ari’s cranky because Ms Fits subscribes to the paper: “Hardy has been in the pocket of The Age” and therefore it would be unethical to interview her. Or something.

I remember the last time Ms Fits was profiled in the media, by Andrew Bolt. There was no advertising deal behind that column — just a phone call from a Young Liberal with a vendetta. That Bolt was “in the pocket” of the Young Liberals is no problem at all.

Tim Blair thinks the recent profile is wrong because “anyone who cares learned long ago that Hardy posts as Ms Fits” (aw, Tim cares) — but perhaps there’s another secret identity? Perhaps there really is a Diana Elgar!

Victory for Pandagate

This just in from our imaginary friend and Diana Elgar’s television industry colleague, Brett Kleinitz:

Hello Webloggers,

As co-recipient of the Best Post award in the Australian Blog Awards, I’d like to thank all of those who voted for us. It was, of course, a team effort and so I’d also so like to thank my fellow winners; Mr. Simon Hollins, BA, LLD, Ms Miranda Airey-Branson, Mr. Alexander Lew and Mr. Andrew Bolt.

I am very proud to have played my own small part in exposing to the many reader’s of the Blogs and of the Herald Sun one of the many depraved minds who populate this Nation’s television and film industries and seek to brainwash the minds of our children with their so-called “creativity”. The vile and foul-mouthed Ms Elgar has thankfully moved on from MacLeod’s Daghters, leaving more than one ruined relationship in her wake, and moved on to a more “adult” programme about young urban professionals at channel 7. I can only imagine these sorts of characters would be more suitable to her style of filthy “humour” that she’d like to put in they’re mouths, and leave the dialogue of the sensible rural characters of MacLeod’s Daghters to those less “sophisticated” writers who can string a sentence together without feeling the need to always including expletives which others have to spend hours and prescious dollars censoring, and can create storylines that don’t involve scenes of need to be completely rewritten.

Australian television is what it is today thanks to the hard work and dedication of dozens of executives and other, more junior, financial and legal minds, the unsung heroes who work behind the scenes with little or no recognition for their efforts, unlike a lot of manky, selfish-indulgent, little fame-whores cock-teasers whose only contribution is a bit of creative talent and a sense of humour.

Thank you for this award. It is truly a vindication.

Yours truly,
Brett Kleinitz.

I’d like to add a few words, if I may.

Pandagate was the strangest experience I have ever had in my life. I’m sure there are many people who still don’t understand exactly what happened (friends of mine who stumbled across it via Crikey said they couldn’t make head nor tail of it), so I’ll try to summarise it briefly.

Read the rest of this entry…

2005 Blog Awards

Four nominations, four victories: Best WA, best design, best political and best post. Thanks, everyone. But that stuff is a sideshow — the real joy of these awards is discovering new blogs through the lists of nominees.

It’s voting time…

It’s time to vote in the 2005 Australian Blog Awards. I’ve been nominated for a few categories, but I’ll only be voting for myself in the Best Post category — and that’s because I had hardly anything to do with the post in question!

MEM(o)RI(es)

Juan Cole criticised MEMRI, and for his trouble copped a threatening letter. His employer was also threatened. Somebody else posted his personal information online, and encouraged others to hassle him. Whether it’s a big issue like Israel/Palestine, or a small issue like Pandagate, the tactics of the Right are always the same.

Pandagate is over

Alex Lew just called me, and we had a very long discussion. The truce has officially been declared: Pandagate is over.

The last word

To those of you who have emailed asking where I’ve been the last while: studying. Administrative law, and looking forward to constitutional law, trusts and evidence over the next couple of weeks. Not much fun, but the end is in sight.

I have changed the title of this post because it was wrong. Andrew Bolt was not lying when he said he had not spoken to Miranda Airey-Branson before he wrote his hatchet job on Ms Fits. He had been interviewed by her, and he had been in contact with Ms Airey-Branson’s friend Alexander Lew. Bolt’s column was written at the urging of the Liberal students. However, by carefully answering questions about his contact with Ms Airey-Branson and ignoring my questions about his contact with Mr Lew, Mr Bolt avoided lying. I apologise for suggesting otherwise.

I have also deleted a comment I left here, which was totally inappropriate and I am ashamed that I posted it in the first place. It was a poor attempt at humour, but of course that is no excuse. I hope that both Mr Bolt and Ms Airey-Branson will accept my apologies.

Apart from those two changes, I don’t propose to back away from anything else I’ve written. If a group of Liberal students are going to:

  • pass themselves off as Greens while distributing Liberal how-to-vote cards;

  • make foul claims (which they know are defamatory) about a member of parliament;

  • publish a photo of the MP’s partner and encourage people to ridicule her;

  • set up a web form and encourage readers to spam another MP; and

  • respond to criticism by contacting people’s employers and attempting to have them sacked,

then I will point out what they’re doing. Since their attacks were largely directed at an MP Mr Bolt says he considers a friend, I am surprised he is taking the Liberals’ side.

Finally, I would like to stress that this blog and its contents are completely unconnected with my employer. I think it would be wrong to put forward my political opinions without telling people about my connection to the ALP, but that does not mean everything — or, for that matter, anything! — I write is endorsed by the ALP. I thought putting a disclaimer to that effect on every page would be enough, but apparently not.

I find it somewhat ironic that my personal website is supposed to be part of an ALP conspiracy. Alexander Lew’s emails tend to be CCed to Liberal players, including Victorian frontbenchers. The only Labor MP I contacted about the Two Cents group was Michael Danby. I sent him a copy of the complaint I wrote to Hot or Not, which resulted in the removal of his partner’s photo from the site. I would have done the same thing if he was a Liberal MP — that kind of behaviour is truly disgusting.

Unless there are any major new developments — there is still a chance that Andrew Bolt will write about the Diana Elgar Affair on the weekend — I don’t propose to write anything more about this. I think we all got what we wanted: a good laugh, and proof the Liberal students can’t argue their way out of a paper bag (at least without running to their respected national friends for help).

Posting will be light until after exams.

Update: New information in point 22 here.

5:21 pm · comments off

Let me make it clear

Let me make it quite clear:

  • I did not have anything to do with the emails until I was sent a Word document on Tuesday morning. I didn’t even know they existed until that time.

  • I did not send any of the emails.

  • I have never emailed Alexander Lew or Miranda Airey-Branson.

  • I emailed Andrew Bolt twice — both times asking whether he had discussed his column with Miranda Airey-Branson, Alexander Lew or Rohan D’Souza.

Any other questions?

Bolt threatens fresh column

Uh-oh. Andrew Bolt just emailed my boss (CCing me) saying he is considering writing about my activities. The thing is, he thinks I wrote the emails that sucked him in — which is not true. But that never stopped him before.

Curly wurly

Darp’s contacts in the Liberal Party have leaked some paperwork relating to Miranda Airey-Branson and Alexander Lew’s official duties. He’s asking for reader feedback on what their handwriting might tell us about them:

Miranda Airey-Branson's handwriting

Feel free to conduct some forensic hand-writing analysis on what you see above. I think the excessive cursive style of Miranda belies her fascination for the curly entrails of a fox after they’ve been ripped out by a pack of dogs at the end of an adrenelaine pounding fox hunt.

Ugh. Making animals rip each other apart for “entertainment” is sickening.

Now buy the t-shirt…

Pandagate - Voting Green?

You’ve followed the saga, now buy the t-shirt. If Miranda buys one, that would be pretty cool.

Meanwhile, Alex has admitted he was wrong. About time, wouldn’t you say?

Diana Elgar unplugged

Gather around people, let me tell you a story. A one-week-long story of power and pride.

And tiny-tories.

And fictional characters.

And last, but by no means least, a respected national columnist.
Read the rest of this entry…

Contact confirmed

Alex tells us that Miranda contacted Andrew Bolt. I wonder why Bolt won’t answer my email and clear this up? Is he embarrassed?

11:18 am · comments off

More backpedalling

Hmm. Alexander Lew’s childish attack on Amanda Mendes da Costa has disappeared. Here’s a cache. Doesn’t take a genius to work out why he was asked to take it down, but if this keeps happening we’ll have nothing left to read!